Wade's Trial

Wade's trial lasted four days. I attended all of them, alone, sitting near the back with Detective Cho a few rows over.

The prosecution built its case around the two decades-old complaints, the more recent third statement, and a pattern-of-conduct argument that connected all three despite the years between them. The defense argued, predictably, that memory fades, that children misremember, that three isolated allegations across twenty years didn't constitute a pattern so much as coincidence.

It was the third witness — the more recent former placement, a woman now in her thirties named Selena — who changed the room's temperature. She testified plainly, without visible anger, about a house with a lock on the outside of one bedroom door and an uncle-in-law who visited more than seemed reasonable for a man with no children of his own in that house. She didn't claim to have proof of what happened during those visits. She claimed only what she'd lived through directly, at Wade's hands, in that same house, years before Ivy ever arrived there.

The jury deliberated for a day and a half and came back with a conviction on the charges tied to Selena's testimony, where the evidence was strongest and most recent. The older complaints, the judge noted in sentencing, remained too degraded by time to support charges on their own, but were admissible as context for a demonstrated pattern — enough, combined with Selena's case, to send Wade away for eleven years.

It wasn't justice for Ivy specifically. Her own experience there was never formally tried, never given its own verdict. But watching Wade led out of that courtroom in handcuffs, I understood something Detective Cho had tried to tell me months earlier: sometimes the wall you build to keep a child safe isn't made of the verdict you wanted. It's made of whatever verdict you can actually get, plus every other choice you make around it, every single day after.